|
|
Impact of Supplementing EASYZYMETM
on Feed Utilization and Pig Performance
Feed cost is
always a major factor in determining profitability of animal
production. When feed ingredient costs increase, it becomes even
more important. Elevated prices of corn and soybean meal (SBM)
drive more and more swine producers to feed alternative
ingredients, such as distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS),
wheat midds, and corn germ meal.
Diets with alternative ingredients often contain higher amounts of
fiber and non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) compared to traditional
corn and SBM diets. Higher NSP diets cannot be utilized as well
because pigs cannot secrete sufficient amounts of carbohydrate
enzymes to break down NSP. Supplementing swine diets with enzymes
can help improve digestion of higher NSP diets. ADM Alliance
Nutrition Research has shown that EASYZYME is an effective enzyme
that can help improve feed utilization and pig performance.
Enzymes and
Non-starch Polysaccharide
Enzymes are primarily composed of protein, which typically
contains 300 or more amino acids. Enzymes function as a chemical
catalyst in the body to speed up biochemical reactions. Without
enzymes, most biochemical reactions within the body would occur
very slowly or not at all. Each enzyme is designed to breakdown a
specific substrate. Several categories of enzymes are involved in
the digestion of feed ingredients in the gastrointestinal tract.
These enzymes are mostly carbohydrases, lipases, proteases, and
phytase. Carbohydrases are a class of enzymes that are
responsible for the hydrolysis of carbohydrates in the
gastrointestinal tract.
Different carbohydrates require different carbohydrases for
hydrolysis. Carbohydrases that are commercially available include
amylase, cellulase, hemicellulase, beta-glucanase, xylanase,
mannanase, alpha-galactosidase, and pectinase. These carbohydrases
are available to the animal industry either as an individual
enzyme or in different combinations. EASYZYME is an NSP enzyme and
contains enzymatic activities of alpha-galactosidase,
galactomanannase, xylanase, and beta-glucanase. It is produced
from a single fermentation process of a fungi organism
Aspergillus niger. The unique process of fermentation and
microbial selection leads to the production of ancillary enzymes
such as amylase, phytase, cellulase and protease that complement
the primary enzymes and assist in the breakdown of complex
substrates in feed ingredients.
Carbohydrates in feedstuffs are classified into three categories:
sugars, oligosaccharides, and polysaccharides. Polysaccharides are
divided into starch and non-starch polysaccharides. Non-starch
polysaccharides can comprise up to 90% of the cell wall of plants.
The most abundant plant cell wall NSP includes cellulose,
hemicelluloses, and pectin. Examples of NSP compounds are
arabinoxylans, beta-glucans, galactomannans, and alpha-galactosides
(raffinose and stachyose).
Concentrations and digestibility of NSP in commonly used
feedstuffs are presented in Table 1. The available digestibility
data indicate that dietary NSP cannot be well digested in
monogastric animals. The use of supplemental NSP enzymes to
breakdown NSP into simple sugars for absorption enables more
efficient use of alternative feedstuffs in swine diets. Absorbed
simple sugars are metabolized in the body to provide energy to
support animal growth. It has been suggested that carbohydrase
benefits observed in poultry and swine studies cannot be
completely accounted for by the energy value derived from their
constitute sugars. "Nutrient encapsulation" is another hypothesis
to help explain enzymes' benefits.
The NSP in plant cell wall encapsulates starch, protein, oil, and
other nutrients within the plant cell. The impermeable cell wall
is a physical barrier between the intestinal enzymes and the cell
components, preventing full utilization of nutrients within the
cell. Hence, supplementing exogenous carbohydrases can help
degrade the physical barrier and release the nutrients trapped
inside the cell wall. This hypothesis is supported by the results
that higher digestibility of protein and amino acids, in addition
to improved digestibility of fiber and gross energy, has been
reported when carbohydrases are supplemented in swine and poultry
diets.
|
Table 1. Concentration and
Digestibility of Non-starch Polysaccharides (NSP) |
|
Ingredient |
Total
NSP (% DM) |
Digestibility (%) |
|
Corn |
11.7 |
NA* |
|
Corn gluten
feed (20%) |
31 |
17 |
|
Distillers
dried grain with solubles |
23.1 |
NA* |
|
Soybean
meal (48%) |
20 |
0 |
|
Canola meal |
13.7 |
NA* |
|
Barley |
15 |
14 |
|
Wheat |
10 |
12 |
|
Sorghum |
12.2 |
NA* |
|
Oats |
16 |
NA* |
|
Peas |
22 |
18 |
|
Rice bran |
25 |
3 |
|
Wheat bran |
33.7 |
NA* |
|
*NA: data
is not available. Adapted from Chesson 1987 and Charlton 1996. |
EASYZYME
in vitro research data
ADM Alliance Nutrition has developed an in vitro procedure
to evaluate digestibility of dry matter and organic matter. In
this in vitro system, three kinds of ileal digesta
collected from pigs fed either corn-SBM diets, corn-SBM-DDGS
diets, or corn-SBM-wheat midds diets were used as substrates for
EASYZYME to breakdown NSP. Adding EASYZYME at 0.01% in the in
vitro system improved dry matter digestibility (Figure 1) of
ileal digesta from all pigs regardless of diet, with pigs fed with
corn-SBM-wheat midds diets having the greatest improvement. Dry
matter digestibility improvement is an indication that EASYZYME
helped degrade NSP in the three test diets.

Another in vitro experiment was conducted to determine
whether EASYZYME can affect physical appearance of feed
ingredients. After one hour treatment with EASYZYME under proper
conditions, SBM appeared very different (Figure 2) under electron
microscopy (magnified 4000X). The physical change of SBM indicated
that EASYZYME might have broken down some SBM cell wall
structures.
EASYZYME
Improvement of Energy and Amino Acid Digestibility
EASYZYME's effect on energy digestibility was
evaluated at the University of Illinois and Texas Tech University
using T-cannulated nursery and finishing pigs. Two treatments
(control vs. control + EASYZYME) were used in these two studies,
in which typical corn-SBM diets were fed to the test pigs. Ten
pigs (weight: 37.0 lb) per treatment were used in the nursery
study, while eight pigs (weight: 206 lb) per treatment were used
in the finisher study. Data from these two studies demonstrated
that adding EASYZYME improved apparent ileal digestibility of
dietary gross energy (Figure 3).
|
Table 2. Effect of EASYZYME
on Apparent Ileal Digestibility of Crude Protein and Key Amino
Acids in Nursery and Finisher Pigs. |
|
|
Nursery
Study |
Finisher
Study |
|
|
Control |
EASYZYME |
Control |
EASYZYME |
|
Crude
protein |
76.2a |
78.4b |
78.9a |
81.7b |
|
Lysine |
80.0a |
81.0b |
85.2a |
86.9b |
|
Methionine |
84.5 |
85.3 |
85.8 |
87.3 |
|
Threonine |
67.9a |
71.6b |
74.9a |
77.7b |
|
Tryptophan |
80.0a |
83.1b |
80.8a |
87.0b |
|
ab
Within a row, means without a common superscript letter differ
within the nursery or finisher study (P < 0.05)
Source: University of Illinois and Texas Tech University. |
The improvement
was 6.5% in the nursery study (P < 0.01) and 2.8% in the finisher
study (P < 0.05). Greater digestibility improvement of dietary
gross energy in nursery pigs was expected since the digestive
system of the nursery pigs is less mature and thus less capable of
hydrolyzing dietary NSP in comparison to growing-finishing pigs.
In
the two studies referenced previously, apparent ileal
digestibility was measured for dietary crude protein, essential
and non-essential amino acids. EASYZYME improved (P < 0.05; Table
2) apparent ileal digestibility of crude protein, lysine,
threonine, and tryptophan in corn-SBM diets in both nursery and
finisher pig studies.
EASYZYME
Nursery Research Data
A swine nursery study was conducted at the University of Illinois
to evaluate whether EASYZYME improved performance of nursery pigs
fed corn-SBM diets. Six pens and 36 pigs per treatment were used
in this study. The three dietary treatments were:
-
Corn-SBM control
diets
-
Control + 0.01%
EASYZYME
-
Control + 0.02%
EASYZYME
The study
consisted of three phases, with phase 1 one week, phase 2 and 3
two weeks each. Increasing dietary inclusion levels of EASYZYME
from 0.00%, 0.01%, to 0.02% did not improve overall daily gain or
final body weight (Table 3). However, EASYZYME improved overall
feed efficiency. These data suggested EASYZYME's optimal inclusion
level was 0.01%.
|
Table 3. Effect of
EASYZYME on Performance of Nursery Pigs fed Corn-Soy Diets
|
|
|
Corn-Soy (CS) |
CS + 0.01% EASYZYME |
CS + 0.02% EASYZYME |
|
Initial weight, lb |
13.8 |
13.9 |
13.8 |
|
Final weight, lb |
41.8 |
42.0 |
42.1 |
|
Daily gain, lb |
0.80 |
0.80 |
0.81 |
|
Feed/gain |
1.74a |
1.63b |
1.67ab |
|
Within a row, means without a common superscript letter differ
- ab: P < 0.05.
Source: University of Illinois |
EASYZYME's effect on performance of late nursery pigs fed high
DDGS diets was evaluated in an ADM study (S08109). In this 21-day
study three dietary treatments were used with six pens and 24 pigs
per treatment (initial pig weight of approximately 20 lb). The
three dietary treatments were:
-
Corn-SBM control
-
Corn-SBM-DDGS
diet (negative control)
-
Corn-SBM-DDGS
plus EASYZYME at 0.01%
DDGS inclusion
level was 30% in treatments 2 and 3. All treatment diets were
formulated to contain similar energy and amino acid contents and
were offered in meal form. Including 30% DDGS tended to decrease
feed intake (P < 0.10; Table 4) and daily gain (P > 0.10) when
compared with pigs fed the corn-SBM diet. However, feed efficiency
was improved (P < 0.05). Adding EASYZYME into the DDGS diet
improved feed intake by 8.9% and daily gain by 6.7% (P < 0.10).
These results are similar to the data presented by Spencer et. al.
during the 2007 Midwest joint meeting of the American Society of
Animal Science and American Dairy Science Association.
|
Table 4. Effect of
EASYZYME on Performance of Late Nursery Pigs Fed Corn-Soy-DDGS
Diets |
|
|
Corn-Soy (CS) |
CS + 30% DDGS |
CS + 30% DDGS + EASYZYME |
|
Daily gain (lb) |
|
ADM S08109 |
1.07ab |
1.04a |
1.11b |
|
Spencer et al., 2007 |
1.17a |
1.19a |
1.23b |
|
Daily feed intake (lb) |
|
|
|
|
ADM S08109 |
1.49a |
1.35b |
1.47a |
|
Spencer et al., 2007 |
1.77c |
1.65d |
1.73c |
|
Feed/gain |
|
ADM S08109 |
1.38c |
1.30d |
1.32d |
|
Spencer et al., 2007 |
1.50c |
1.39d |
1.40d |
|
Test pig weight was from 20 to 50 lb.
Within a row, means without a common superscript letter differ
- ab: P < 0.10; cd: P < 0.05.
Source: ADM Research Study S08109 and Spencer et al., Journal
of Animal Science 2007 Abstract. |
EASYZYME
Grow-Finish Research Data
ADM Alliance Nutrition conducted two grow-finish studies to
evaluate whether EASYZYME could improve performance of grow-finish
pigs fed diets containing high levels of alternative ingredients.
In the 39-day finisher study (S04203), three dietary treatments
were used:
-
Corn-SBM-animal
fat control diets
-
Control + 20%
wheat midds
-
Control + 20%
wheat midds + 0.01% EASYZYME

Close to 2% animal fat was added to the control diet, but was
removed from the other two diets. Inclusion of wheat midds and
removal of animal fat for treatments 2 and 3 resulted in 100
kcal/lb less metabolizable energy (ME) in the diets. Each
treatment was represented by nine pens and 45 pigs. Pigs fed
treatment 2 diet containing wheat midds grew slower and converted
feed less efficiently (P < 0.05; Figure 4) compared to pigs fed
the corn-SBM-animal fat control diet. Supplementing EASYZYME into
diets with high wheat midds resulted in 7% daily gain improvement
(P < 0.05; Figure 4), but had no significant effect on feed
efficiency.
ADM study (S08205)
evaluated the effect of EASYZYME on performance of grow-finish
pigs fed DDGS diets. Five dietary treatments were adopted in this
study.
1)
Corn-SBM control
2)
Corn-SBM-15% DDGS
3)
Corn-SBM-30% DDGS
4)
Corn-SBM-15% DDGS-0.01% EASYZYME
5)
Corn-SBM-30% DDGS-0.01% EASYZYME
Each treatment was
represented by five pens and 19 pigs. Diets were formulated to
contain similar ME and amino acid concentrations within each
phase. Increasing DDGS from 0% to 15% or 30% decreased (P < 0.10)
daily gain and body weight during the grower stage (51 days; Table
5). In addition, increasing dietary DDGS linearly decreased feed
efficiency (P < 0.05) during the grower stage and the entire
105-day study. Supplementing 0.01% EASYZYME into DDGS diets
improved feed efficiency in both grower stage (P < 0.05) and the
entire study (P < 0.10), when compared with DDGS diets without
EASYZYME. As a result, EASYZYME brought the poorer feed efficiency
from feeding DDGS diets back to be similar to that of corn-SBM
diets. The feed efficiency improvement is believed to be related
to degradation of NSP by EASYZYME. In this study, EASYZYME
increased hog market weight by 7.5 lb and 3.6 lb, respectively,
when compared with pigs fed 15% or 30% DDGS diets that contained
no EASYZYME.
|
Table 5. Effect of
EASYZYME and DDGS on Performance of Grow-Finish Pigs |
|
Treatment
No. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
DDGS, % |
0 |
15 |
30 |
15 |
30 |
|
EASYZYME, % |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
Initial
weight, lb |
54.8 |
54.8 |
54.8 |
54.8 |
54.8 |
|
Grower weight,
lb* |
167.4 |
161.5 |
164.6 |
167.2 |
165.7 |
|
Finisher
weight, lb |
279.9 |
277.6 |
280.4 |
285.1 |
284.0 |
|
Average
daily gain, lb |
|
Grower
stage* |
2.18 |
2.05 |
2.11 |
2.18 |
2.13 |
|
Grower +
finisher |
2.13 |
2.09 |
2.13 |
2.19 |
2.18 |
|
Average
daily feed intake, lb |
|
Grower stage |
4.97 |
4.84 |
5.10 |
4.97 |
4.91 |
|
Grower +
finisher |
6.01 |
6.05 |
6.31 |
6.18 |
6.18 |
|
Feed:gain
ratio |
|
Grower
stage**^ |
2.28 |
2.36 |
2.40 |
2.29 |
2.29 |
|
Grower+finisher**^^ |
2.84 |
2.88 |
2.94 |
2.84 |
2.85 |
|
*DDGS level
quadratic effect: P < 0.10; **DDGS level linear effect: P <
0.05; ^EASYZYME effect: P < 0.05; ^^EASYZYME effect: P < 0.10.
ADM
Research Study S08205 |
EASYZYME Sow
Research Data
A small sow study was conducted at Texas Tech University, using 10
sows per treatment. Supplementing 0.01% EASYZYME into lactation
diets of first parity sows reduced sow weight loss in the first
week (P < 0.01; Table 6) and the entire 21-day lactation (P <
0.05). Furthermore, EASYZYME helped decrease weaning-to-estrus
interval (P < 0.05). A large scale sow study is needed to confirm
the positive findings observed in this small sow study.
|
Table 6. Effect of
EASYZYME on Performance of First Parity Lactating Sows |
|
|
Control |
Control +
EASYZYME |
|
No. of sows |
10 |
10 |
|
Sow weight at
farrowing, lb |
362.34 |
360.14 |
|
Sow weight
change, lb |
|
|
|
Week 1 |
-16.37A |
2.42B |
|
Week 2 |
-7.04 |
-0.55 |
|
Week 3 |
-4.75 |
-6.51 |
|
Overall |
-28.16C |
-4.64D |
|
Litter size at
weaning |
8.77 |
8.67 |
|
Wean-to-estrus, day |
5.94C |
4.68D |
|
Within a row,
means without a common superscript letter differ - AB: P <
0.01; CD: P < 0.05.
Source:
Texas Tech University |
Summary
Common feed ingredients, especially alternative ingredients such
as DDGS, wheat midds, and corn germ meal, contain high levels of
NSP. Endogenous enzymes in swine do not sufficiently digest the
NSP portion of plant ingredients. Supplementing swine diets with
exogenous carbohydrases, such as EASYZYME, can help effectively
degrade NSP in swine diets to provide more energy. EASYZYME is an
NSP enzyme containing several carbohydrases. Both university and
ADM internal research data have shown that EASYZYME can improve
energy and nutrient digestibility, and improve performance of
nursery and grow-finish pigs fed diets containing high levels of
NSP (corn-SBM-DDGS, corn-SBM-wheat midds, or corn-SBM diets).
Therefore, EASYZYME can be used to improve pig performance or to
decrease formulation cost by feeding a lower energy diet.
Reference available upon request
|
ADM
Alliance Nutrition |
|
Economic calculation of using
EASYZYMETM
or EASYZYMETM
Mixer 1 in swine diets |
|
To calculate EASYZYMETM
value, enter performance expectations in the highlighted
cells. Example calculations are provided for wean-finish and
grow-finish operations. |
| |
|
Report Date: 11/19/08 |
|
|
Example Calculations* |
|
|
|
Wean-Finish |
Grow-Finish |
Your Operation |
|
Pig In weight, lb |
13 |
60 |
A |
|
Pig Out weight, lb |
268 |
268 |
B |
|
Overall feed efficiency (F:G) |
2.70 |
3.00 |
C |
|
Average feed cost ($/ton) |
$285 |
$260 |
D |
|
EASYZYME
cost/ton treated feed ($) |
$2.00 |
$2.00 |
E |
|
Expected improvement of F:G by
using EASYZYMETM
(%) * |
3.00 |
3.00 |
F |
| |
|
|
|
|
Weight gain, lb |
255 |
208 |
G = B - A |
|
Feed consumed/pig (lb, w/o enzyme) |
689 |
624 |
H = C - (C x F ÷ 100) |
|
Overall feed efficiency (w/
enzyme) |
2.62 |
2.91 |
I = C x G |
|
Feed consumed/pig (lb, w/ enzyme) |
668 |
605 |
J = H x G |
|
Feed difference (lb/pig) |
20.7 |
18.7 |
K = I - J |
|
Feed savings ($/pig) from using
EASYZYMETM |
$2.94 |
$2.43 |
L = K x D ÷ 2000 |
|
# pigs fed/ton feed |
2.99 |
3.30 |
M = 2000 ÷ J |
|
EASYZYMETM
cost ($/pig) |
$0.67 |
$0.61 |
N = E ÷ M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on EASYZYMETM |
4.41 |
4.02 |
O = L ÷ N |
|
Net value ($/pig) |
$2.28 |
$1.83 |
P = L - N |
|
Net Value per 1000-head barn, $ |
$2,275 |
$1,828 |
Q = P x 1000 |
| |
|
|
|
|
* Based on EASYZYMETM
swine research studies, feed efficiency improvements varied
from 2% to 6%. |
|
-
Example calculations are provided for wean-finish and
grow-finish operations. To calculate EASYZYME value to a
specific operation, enter inputs in rows A to F, and calculate
values G to Q based on formulas provided.
To download an excel spreadsheet calculator for determining
potential EASYZYME value, click here:
No representation of
profitability is hereby made. The statements and figures shown
here are estimates and projections. Neither ADM Alliance
Nutrition, Inc., nor its employees, agents, or assigns make
any warranty of any kind, including warranty of
merchantability or results, relative to the information
contained herein. Actual results will be affected by the
ability of animals to gain, health of animals, management,
previous treatment, environment, etc.
This proposal subject to credit approval by ADM Alliance
Nutrition, Inc. |
|