Impact of Supplementing EASYZYMETM
on Feed Utilization and Pig Performance

 

 

Feed cost is always a major factor in determining profitability of animal production. When feed ingredient costs increase, it becomes even more important. Elevated prices of corn and soybean meal (SBM) drive more and more swine producers to feed alternative ingredients, such as distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS), wheat midds, and corn germ meal.

Diets with alternative ingredients often contain higher amounts of fiber and non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) compared to traditional corn and SBM diets. Higher NSP diets cannot be utilized as well because pigs cannot secrete sufficient amounts of carbohydrate enzymes to break down NSP. Supplementing swine diets with enzymes can help improve digestion of higher NSP diets. ADM Alliance Nutrition Research has shown that EASYZYME is an effective enzyme that can help improve feed utilization and pig performance.

Enzymes and Non-starch Polysaccharide

Enzymes are primarily composed of protein, which typically contains 300 or more amino acids. Enzymes function as a chemical catalyst in the body to speed up biochemical reactions. Without enzymes, most biochemical reactions within the body would occur very slowly or not at all. Each enzyme is designed to breakdown a specific substrate. Several categories of enzymes are involved in the digestion of feed ingredients in the gastrointestinal tract. These enzymes are mostly carbohydrases, lipases, proteases, and phytase.  Carbohydrases are a class of enzymes that are responsible for the hydrolysis of carbohydrates in the gastrointestinal tract. 

Different carbohydrates require different carbohydrases for hydrolysis. Carbohydrases that are commercially available include amylase, cellulase, hemicellulase, beta-glucanase, xylanase, mannanase, alpha-galactosidase, and pectinase. These carbohydrases are available to the animal industry either as an individual enzyme or in different combinations. EASYZYME is an NSP enzyme and contains enzymatic activities of alpha-galactosidase, galactomanannase, xylanase, and beta-glucanase. It is produced from a single fermentation process of a fungi organism  Aspergillus niger. The unique process of fermentation and microbial selection leads to the production of ancillary enzymes such as amylase, phytase, cellulase and protease that complement the primary enzymes and assist in the breakdown of complex substrates in feed ingredients.

Carbohydrates in feedstuffs are classified into three categories: sugars, oligosaccharides, and polysaccharides. Polysaccharides are divided into starch and non-starch polysaccharides. Non-starch polysaccharides can comprise up to 90% of the cell wall of plants. The most abundant plant cell wall NSP includes cellulose, hemicelluloses, and pectin. Examples of NSP compounds are arabinoxylans, beta-glucans, galactomannans, and alpha-galactosides (raffinose and stachyose).

Concentrations and digestibility of NSP in commonly used feedstuffs are presented in Table 1. The available digestibility data indicate that dietary NSP cannot be well digested in monogastric animals. The use of supplemental NSP enzymes to breakdown NSP into simple sugars for absorption enables more efficient use of alternative feedstuffs in swine diets. Absorbed simple sugars are metabolized in the body to provide energy to support animal growth. It has been suggested that carbohydrase benefits observed in poultry and swine studies cannot be completely accounted for by the energy value derived from their constitute sugars. "Nutrient encapsulation" is another hypothesis to help explain enzymes' benefits. 

The NSP in plant cell wall encapsulates starch, protein, oil, and other nutrients within the plant cell. The impermeable cell wall is a physical barrier between the intestinal enzymes and the cell components, preventing full utilization of nutrients within the cell. Hence, supplementing exogenous carbohydrases can help degrade the physical barrier and release the nutrients trapped inside the cell wall. This hypothesis is supported by the results that higher digestibility of protein and amino acids, in addition to improved digestibility of fiber and gross energy, has been reported when carbohydrases are supplemented in swine and poultry diets.
 

Table 1. Concentration and Digestibility of Non-starch Polysaccharides (NSP)

Ingredient

Total NSP (% DM)

Digestibility (%)

Corn

11.7

NA*

Corn gluten feed (20%)

31

17

Distillers dried grain with solubles

23.1

NA*

Soybean meal (48%)

20

0

Canola meal

13.7

NA*

Barley

15

14

Wheat

10

12

Sorghum

12.2

NA*

Oats

16

NA*

Peas

22

18

Rice bran

25

3

Wheat bran

33.7

NA*

*NA: data is not available. Adapted from Chesson 1987 and Charlton 1996.

 

EASYZYME in vitro research data
ADM Alliance Nutrition has developed an in vitro procedure to evaluate digestibility of dry matter and organic matter. In this in vitro system, three kinds of ileal digesta collected from pigs fed either corn-SBM diets, corn-SBM-DDGS diets, or corn-SBM-wheat midds diets were used as substrates for EASYZYME to breakdown NSP. Adding EASYZYME at 0.01% in the in vitro system improved dry matter digestibility (Figure 1) of ileal digesta from all pigs regardless of diet, with pigs fed with corn-SBM-wheat midds diets having the greatest improvement. Dry matter digestibility improvement is an indication that EASYZYME helped degrade NSP in the three test diets.




Another in vitro experiment was conducted to determine whether EASYZYME can affect physical appearance of feed ingredients. After one hour treatment with EASYZYME under proper conditions, SBM appeared very different (Figure 2) under electron microscopy (magnified 4000X). The physical change of SBM indicated that EASYZYME might have broken down some SBM cell wall structures.

 

 

 

 

EASYZYME Improvement of Energy and Amino Acid Digestibility
EASYZYME's effect on energy digestibility was evaluated at the University of Illinois and Texas Tech University using T-cannulated nursery and finishing pigs. Two treatments (control vs. control + EASYZYME) were used in these two studies, in which typical corn-SBM diets were fed to the test pigs. Ten pigs (weight: 37.0 lb) per treatment were used in the nursery study, while eight pigs (weight: 206 lb) per treatment were used in the finisher study. Data from these two studies demonstrated that adding EASYZYME improved apparent ileal digestibility of dietary gross energy (Figure 3).

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2. Effect of EASYZYME on Apparent Ileal Digestibility of Crude Protein and Key Amino Acids in Nursery and Finisher Pigs.

 

Nursery Study

Finisher Study

 

Control

EASYZYME

Control

EASYZYME

Crude protein

76.2a

78.4b

78.9a

81.7b

Lysine

80.0a

81.0b

85.2a

86.9b

Methionine

84.5

85.3

85.8

87.3

Threonine

67.9a

71.6b

74.9a

77.7b

Tryptophan

80.0a

83.1b

80.8a

87.0b

ab Within a row, means without a common superscript letter differ within the nursery or finisher study (P < 0.05)

Source: University of Illinois and Texas Tech University.

 

The improvement was 6.5% in the nursery study (P < 0.01) and 2.8% in the finisher study (P < 0.05). Greater digestibility improvement of dietary gross energy in nursery pigs was expected since the digestive system of the nursery pigs is less mature and thus less capable of hydrolyzing dietary NSP in comparison to growing-finishing pigs.

In the two studies referenced previously, apparent ileal digestibility was measured for dietary crude protein, essential and non-essential amino acids. EASYZYME improved (P < 0.05; Table 2) apparent ileal digestibility of crude protein, lysine, threonine, and tryptophan in corn-SBM diets in both nursery and finisher pig studies. 

 

EASYZYME Nursery Research Data
A swine nursery study was conducted at the University of Illinois to evaluate whether EASYZYME improved performance of nursery pigs fed corn-SBM diets. Six pens and 36 pigs per treatment were used in this study. The three dietary treatments were:

  1. Corn-SBM control diets

  2. Control + 0.01% EASYZYME

  3. Control + 0.02% EASYZYME


The study consisted of three phases, with phase 1 one week, phase 2 and 3 two weeks each. Increasing dietary inclusion levels of EASYZYME from 0.00%, 0.01%, to 0.02% did not improve overall daily gain or final body weight (Table 3). However, EASYZYME improved overall feed efficiency. These data suggested EASYZYME's optimal inclusion level was 0.01%.
 

Table 3. Effect of EASYZYME on Performance of Nursery Pigs fed Corn-Soy Diets

 

Corn-Soy (CS)

CS + 0.01% EASYZYME

CS + 0.02% EASYZYME

Initial weight, lb

13.8

13.9

13.8

Final weight, lb

41.8

42.0

42.1

Daily gain, lb

0.80

0.80

0.81

Feed/gain

1.74a

1.63b

1.67ab

Within a row, means without a common superscript letter differ - ab: P < 0.05.

Source: University of Illinois


EASYZYME's effect on performance of late nursery pigs fed high DDGS diets was evaluated in an ADM study (S08109). In this 21-day study three dietary treatments were used with six pens and 24 pigs per treatment (initial pig weight of approximately 20 lb). The three dietary treatments were:

  1. Corn-SBM control

  2. Corn-SBM-DDGS diet (negative control)

  3. Corn-SBM-DDGS plus EASYZYME at 0.01%
     

DDGS inclusion level was 30% in treatments 2 and 3. All treatment diets were formulated to contain similar energy and amino acid contents and were offered in meal form. Including 30% DDGS tended to decrease feed intake (P < 0.10; Table 4) and daily gain (P > 0.10) when compared with pigs fed the corn-SBM diet. However, feed efficiency was improved (P < 0.05). Adding EASYZYME into the DDGS diet improved feed intake by 8.9% and daily gain by 6.7% (P < 0.10). These results are similar to the data presented by Spencer et. al. during the 2007 Midwest joint meeting of the American Society of Animal Science and American Dairy Science Association.
 

Table 4. Effect of EASYZYME on Performance of Late Nursery Pigs Fed Corn-Soy-DDGS Diets

 

Corn-Soy (CS)

CS + 30% DDGS

CS + 30% DDGS + EASYZYME

Daily gain (lb)

  ADM S08109

1.07ab

1.04a

1.11b

  Spencer  et al., 2007

1.17a

1.19a

1.23b

Daily feed intake (lb)

 

 

 

  ADM S08109

1.49a

1.35b

1.47a

  Spencer et al., 2007

1.77c

1.65d

1.73c

Feed/gain

  ADM S08109

1.38c

1.30d

1.32d

  Spencer et al., 2007

1.50c

1.39d

1.40d

Test pig weight was from 20 to 50 lb.

Within a row, means without a common superscript letter differ - ab: P < 0.10; cd: P < 0.05.

Source: ADM Research Study S08109 and Spencer et al., Journal of Animal Science 2007 Abstract.

 

EASYZYME Grow-Finish Research Data
ADM Alliance Nutrition conducted two grow-finish studies to evaluate whether EASYZYME could improve performance of grow-finish pigs fed diets containing high levels of alternative ingredients. In the 39-day finisher study (S04203), three dietary treatments were used:

  1. Corn-SBM-animal fat control diets

  2. Control + 20% wheat midds

  3. Control + 20% wheat midds + 0.01% EASYZYME


Close to 2% animal fat was added to the control diet, but was removed from the other two diets. Inclusion of wheat midds and removal of animal fat for treatments 2 and 3 resulted in 100 kcal/lb less metabolizable energy (ME) in the diets.  Each treatment was represented by nine pens and 45 pigs.  Pigs fed treatment 2 diet containing wheat midds grew slower and converted feed less efficiently (P < 0.05; Figure 4) compared to pigs fed the corn-SBM-animal fat control diet. Supplementing EASYZYME into diets with high wheat midds resulted in 7% daily gain improvement (P < 0.05; Figure 4), but had no significant effect on feed efficiency.

ADM study (S08205) evaluated the effect of EASYZYME on performance of grow-finish pigs fed DDGS diets. Five dietary treatments were adopted in this study.

 

1)     Corn-SBM control

2)     Corn-SBM-15% DDGS

3)     Corn-SBM-30% DDGS

4)     Corn-SBM-15% DDGS-0.01% EASYZYME

5)     Corn-SBM-30% DDGS-0.01% EASYZYME

Each treatment was represented by five pens and 19 pigs. Diets were formulated to contain similar ME and amino acid concentrations within each phase. Increasing DDGS from 0% to 15% or 30% decreased (P < 0.10) daily gain and body weight during the grower stage (51 days; Table 5). In addition, increasing dietary DDGS linearly decreased feed efficiency (P < 0.05) during the grower stage and the entire 105-day study. Supplementing 0.01% EASYZYME into DDGS diets improved feed efficiency in both grower stage (P < 0.05) and the entire study (P < 0.10), when compared with DDGS diets without EASYZYME. As a result, EASYZYME brought the poorer feed efficiency from feeding DDGS diets back to be similar to that of corn-SBM diets. The feed efficiency improvement is believed to be related to degradation of NSP by EASYZYME. In this study, EASYZYME increased hog market weight by 7.5 lb and 3.6 lb, respectively, when compared with pigs fed 15% or 30% DDGS diets that contained no EASYZYME. 

 

Table 5. Effect of EASYZYME and DDGS on Performance of Grow-Finish Pigs

Treatment No.

1

2

3

4

5

DDGS, %

0

15

30

15

30

EASYZYME, %

0

0

0

0.01

0.01

Initial weight, lb

54.8

54.8

54.8

54.8

54.8

Grower weight, lb*

167.4

161.5

164.6

167.2

165.7

Finisher weight, lb

279.9

277.6

280.4

285.1

284.0

Average daily gain, lb

  Grower stage*

2.18

2.05

2.11

2.18

2.13

  Grower + finisher

2.13

2.09

2.13

2.19

2.18

Average daily feed intake, lb

  Grower stage

4.97

4.84

5.10

4.97

4.91

  Grower + finisher

6.01

6.05

6.31

6.18

6.18

Feed:gain ratio

  Grower stage**^

2.28

2.36

2.40

2.29

2.29

  Grower+finisher**^^

2.84

2.88

2.94

2.84

2.85

*DDGS level quadratic effect: P < 0.10; **DDGS level linear effect: P < 0.05; ^EASYZYME effect: P < 0.05; ^^EASYZYME effect: P < 0.10.

ADM Research Study S08205


 

EASYZYME Sow Research Data
A small sow study was conducted at Texas Tech University, using 10 sows per treatment. Supplementing 0.01% EASYZYME into lactation diets of first parity sows reduced sow weight loss in the first week (P < 0.01; Table 6) and the entire 21-day lactation (P < 0.05). Furthermore, EASYZYME helped decrease weaning-to-estrus interval (P < 0.05). A large scale sow study is needed to confirm the positive findings observed in this small sow study.
 

 

Table 6. Effect of EASYZYME on Performance of First Parity Lactating Sows

 

Control

Control + EASYZYME

No. of sows

10

10

Sow weight at farrowing, lb

362.34

360.14

Sow weight change, lb

 

 

    Week 1

-16.37A

2.42B

    Week 2

-7.04

-0.55

    Week 3

-4.75

-6.51

    Overall

-28.16C

-4.64D

Litter size at weaning

8.77

8.67

Wean-to-estrus, day

5.94C

4.68D

Within a row, means without a common superscript letter differ - AB: P < 0.01; CD: P < 0.05.

Source: Texas Tech University

 

 Summary
Common feed ingredients, especially alternative ingredients such as DDGS, wheat midds, and corn germ meal, contain high levels of NSP.  Endogenous enzymes in swine do not sufficiently digest the NSP portion of plant ingredients. Supplementing swine diets with exogenous carbohydrases, such as EASYZYME, can help effectively degrade NSP in swine diets to provide more energy. EASYZYME is an NSP enzyme containing several carbohydrases. Both university and ADM internal research data have shown that EASYZYME can improve energy and nutrient digestibility, and improve performance of nursery and grow-finish pigs fed diets containing high levels of NSP (corn-SBM-DDGS, corn-SBM-wheat midds, or corn-SBM diets). Therefore, EASYZYME can be used to improve pig performance or to decrease formulation cost by feeding a lower energy diet. 

Reference available upon request

 

 

ADM Alliance Nutrition

Economic calculation of using EASYZYMETM or EASYZYMETM Mixer 1 in swine diets


To calculate EASYZYME
TM  value, enter performance expectations in the highlighted cells.  Example calculations are provided for wean-finish and grow-finish operations. 

   

Report Date:  11/19/08

 

Example Calculations*

 

 

Wean-Finish

Grow-Finish

Your Operation

Pig In weight, lb

13

60

A

Pig Out weight, lb

268

268

B

Overall feed efficiency (F:G)

2.70

3.00

C

Average feed cost ($/ton)

$285

$260

D

EASYZYME cost/ton treated feed ($)

$2.00

$2.00

E

Expected improvement of F:G by using EASYZYMETM (%) *

3.00

3.00

F

       

Weight gain, lb

255

208

G = B - A

Feed consumed/pig (lb, w/o enzyme)

689

624

H = C - (C x F ÷ 100)

Overall feed efficiency (w/ enzyme)

2.62

2.91

I = C x  G

Feed consumed/pig (lb, w/ enzyme)

668

605

J = H  x G

Feed difference (lb/pig)

20.7

18.7

K = I - J

Feed savings ($/pig) from using EASYZYMETM

$2.94

$2.43

L = K x  D ÷ 2000

# pigs fed/ton feed

2.99

3.30

M = 2000 ÷ J

EASYZYMETM cost ($/pig)

$0.67

$0.61

N = E ÷ M

 

 

 

 

Return on EASYZYMETM

4.41

4.02

O = L ÷ N

Net value ($/pig)

$2.28

$1.83

P = L - N

Net Value per 1000-head barn, $

$2,275

$1,828

Q = P x 1000

       

* Based on EASYZYMETM swine research studies, feed efficiency improvements varied from 2% to 6%.

 

- Example calculations are provided for wean-finish and grow-finish operations. To calculate EASYZYME value to a specific operation, enter inputs in rows A to F, and calculate values G to Q based on formulas provided.

 

To download an excel spreadsheet calculator for determining potential EASYZYME value, click here:
 

No representation of profitability is hereby made. The statements and figures shown here are estimates and projections. Neither ADM Alliance Nutrition, Inc., nor its employees, agents, or assigns make any warranty of any kind, including warranty of merchantability or results, relative to the information contained herein. Actual results will be affected by the ability of animals to gain, health of animals, management, previous treatment, environment, etc.

This proposal subject to credit approval by ADM Alliance Nutrition, Inc.

 

 

ADM Alliance Nutrition, Inc. , a wholly owned subsidiary of the Archer Daniels Midland Company